Seriously, yes it does.
>You didn't say "non-binding". :-)
>
>Seriously though, does it actually make a difference?
>
>>Nope. That resolution was a
nonbinding resolution which is basically nothing more than a
recommendation. The UN would need to vote through a
binding resolution for the U.S. to violate it by not adhering to it.
>>
>>
>>>The blockade of Cuba.
>>>
>>>>Which UN resolutions has the
U.S. repeatedly violated?
>>>>
>>>>>Repeated and continuous violations of U.N. resolutions, just like the US and Israel, I do not see you outraged by that
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"
