I've been looking into this. Binding vs non-binding is a matter of interpretation and not a property of a resolution. This is often a subjec of a debate after a resolution is passed.

>Seriously, yes it does.

>>You didn't say "non-binding". :-)
>>
>>Seriously though, does it actually make a difference?
>>
>>>Nope. That resolution was a nonbinding resolution which is basically nothing more than a recommendation. The UN would need to vote through a binding resolution for the U.S. to violate it by not adhering to it.
>>>
>>>
>>>>The blockade of Cuba.
>>>>
>>>>>Which UN resolutions has the U.S. repeatedly violated?
>>>>>
>>>>>>Repeated and continuous violations of U.N. resolutions, just like the US and Israel, I do not see you outraged by that