>>I usually agree with you, but not in this case. For one thing the story is all over the news, so you can't say it has been hushed up. I also don't think there is anything about Republicans that makes them more likely to be sexual predators than anyone else. Kind of a cheap shot IMO.
>
>Well it was hushed up for many months before it saw the sunshine.
>
>But I do agree that party affiliation has little to do with social deviance. Though I'd bet that MBAs, deviants+, are mainly Republicans.

MBAs? Maybe the acronym means something different from what I am thinking of, which is people with Management in Business Administration degrees. I have no doubt they are predominantly Republican but don't get the link to sexual deviants.