>>>I usually agree with you, but not in this case. For one thing the story is all over the news, so you can't say it has been hushed up. I also don't think there is anything about Republicans that makes them more likely to be sexual predators than anyone else. Kind of a cheap shot IMO.
>>
>>Well it was hushed up for many months before it saw the sunshine.
>>
>>But I do agree that party affiliation has little to do with social deviance. Though I'd bet that MBAs, deviants+, are mainly Republicans.
>
>MBAs? Maybe the acronym means something different from what I am thinking of, which is people with Management in Business Administration degrees. I have no doubt they are predominantly Republican but don't get the link to sexual deviants.

No, SOCIAL deviance (of MBAs).
These guys/gals training, backed up by law, is that the only thing that matters is shareholder equity and any social/societal implications of decisions they make are to be NIL if it changes the equity position negatively in any way.