Tracy,

I was talking about a message in which thread you participated, replying to my answer nonetheless <g> Message #1153587. I know it was not the sole excuse, and that is one thing that is uneasing, the whole justification for the war is always a vague list of excuses where some of them, which are undeniable true, are trown in the mix to hide the fact that the real important ones are highly doubtful, and, neverminding the fact that corruption (in this case) affects every country.

>I dont' recall anyone on this forum every claiming what you implied Hugo. I think many may have pointed out that corruption existed and corruption may have been included in a list of problems in Iraq both before and after the invasion, but I don't think anyone ever listed it as the sole excuse (or the sole or even main justification) for invading a country. Can you provide a link to a message where that was done Hugo? I would be very interested in reading it. I must've missed that one...
>
>
>
>>Jim,
>>
>>I would be very interested in reading the opinion of those who claimed that corruption is a good excuse for invading a country.