>My company produces an application which uses native VFP databases/tables. Because of the nature of the business our application caters to, there will never be a need to migrate to a database server platform.
>
>However, one of our competitors uses Oracle for their data source.
>
>In order to woo several potential clients to our application I need to know the benefits of using VFP vs Oracle for our data source.
>
>We can already rule out cost and speed of data retrieval; they just don't care about that.
>
>What else makes VFP databases/tables preferable to Oracle?
If they truly don't care about cost, VFP has no advantages over Oracle. Oracle would definitely be the better choice.
Of course, no rational person or organization does not care about cost.
Regards. Al
"Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent." -- Isaac Asimov
"Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right." -- Isaac Asimov
Neither a despot, nor a doormat, be
Every app wants to be a database app when it grows up
