That's a good point, but the circumstances were completely different. In WWI an aggressive enemy was attempting to take over all of Europe and probably the rest of the world if that had worked. WWII, same thing, plus we were directly attacked, so of course we joined the war. Contrast that with the Iraq war. We didn't join a war, we started it, and we did it against a country that not only had not done anything to us but was not a credible threat to do so. (Talking about real threats, not the tapestry of lies the administration spun us to justify the invasion).


>
>By your logic then we'd have never bothered with WWI or WWII either.
>
>>So, lets throw American troops into the meat grinder to stop someone who wasn't
>>killing Americans to start with.
>>
>>hhmmmm. The logic escapes me