Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Michael J. Fox's latest ad
Message
From
05/11/2006 14:09:40
 
General information
Forum:
Politics
Category:
Other
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01165623
Message ID:
01167200
Views:
15
Thank you for proving my point. There are many articles floating around these days about how thinking people, be they repubs/independents are horrified by politics today.

They can rationally think processes thru, for themselves. They can read thru all the tea leafs to see what these people in power today really think. They don't feel the need to be led, like yourself.

So I take it from your unrelenting repub support that you also support pedophilia, gay sex, meth amphetamines, selling your congressional vote, handing no-bid, cost-plus contracts to your buds (with no oversite to verify the quality).




>>Just to humor you, I've been reading articles on the bill in Missou for the last hour.
>>
>>Normal people (those in favor of the bill), have specifically address wingnut (religious crazies like you) issues like cloning.
>>
>>The consensus is, the bill specifically outlaws cloning. However, like much of what is spoonfed to tools like you, the cloning argument is completely made up.
>>
>Perry, while I'm tempted to descend into the mud with you, I'll "stay the course" and stay on the high road. Words mean things, and when used in a legal sense, they will be parsed down to the consonants. From the initiative:
>
>The definition of cloning - (2) “Clone or attempt to clone a human being” means to implant in a uterus or attempt to implant in a uterus anything other than the product of fertilization of an egg of a human female by a sperm of a human male for the purpose of initiating a pregnancy that could result in the creation of a human fetus, or the birth of a human being.
>
>Cloning is done before implantation, so this wording sounds good, but is actually very deceptive. It leaves it wide open to do the cloning, then implant. Then there is also the problem of intent. What if your intent wasn't to create a fetus, or to cause the birth of a human being? This is just more of the same from the libs.
>
>Stem cell research is already legal in Missour, so once again, the wacko fringe liberals are trying to pull a fast one. I don't think it's going to work.

(On an infant's shirt): Already smarter than Bush
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform