>Ok, it was a bad example (a bad mood also i guess :)),
>anyway i think VFP programming language can be greatly improved
>to make it more consistent.

Don't even think that please... If it could be done, it should
already have been done 10 years ago in the days of Ashton Tate.
And if M$ really starts changing the language, with the powerful
conversion tools they usually accompany it with (sic!), like they
passed from FPD to FPW or from FPW to VFP, then you can kiss it
good bye.

To get what you want, you must hope that 1. Borland _can_ recover
and 2. that they make Delphi compliant with Rushmore engine.

Regards,

Marc in no particular mood.