I must have misunderstood you. Did you mean to state that if George Bush, who considers himself a christian, saw Jesus hug a homosexual, he would declare Jesus a terrorist? Your basis for that statement is? There is a LOT that I do not like about our current President's policies, but I really cannot see that as very accurate but rather what I would consider a 'hatemonger' comment. While I disagree with George Bush on gay marriage, the only comments of his that I am aware of regarding homosexuality and gay marriage are:


"Yes, I am mindful that we're all sinners," the president said Wednesday when asked for his views on homosexuality. "And I caution those who may try to take the speck out of the neighbor's eye when they've got a log in their own."

"I think it's very important for our society to respect each individual, to welcome those with good hearts, to be a welcoming country," Bush added. "On the other hand, that does not mean that somebody like me needs to compromise on an issue such as marriage."


It doesn't read anywhere that he hates homosexuals or considers them terrorists. He simply agrees with you and believes that marriage should be between a man and a women. He would like to see that codified into law though.

Are there other comments I am unaware of? A lot of special interest groups and the media tend to 'read into' comments but I have not seen any actual anti-homosexual quotes or any which associate homosexuals with terrorists. The closest he has come is to suggest that homosexuality is a sin. Again, that is a religious opinion.






>>>>Truly, religion aside, I never imagine my family as servants of anyone or anything (or any nothing, for that matter). But if I'd have to find a goal, it would be the better future of mankind - all mankind, not just the agnostics.
>>>
>>>one more time, personally speaking.. you have no idea what really means pleasure.. slavery doesn't have anything to do with servants.. itis only comparable to write a book, to plant a tree or to produce any perpetual work of art.
>>
>>That's actually what I meant. We've built one house with our hands, rebuilt another, at some point we (two families) planted 2400 trees, I used to donate blood - we know the feeling.
>>
>>The difference is that we think that doing good is pleasure in itself, as it is good for mankind - not because any particular religion says so, or to serve any entity other than mankind.
>
>sure... this is Christianity..
>
>Be a Jesus disciple it doesn't have anything to do with follow a religion.. The human kind has disfigured completely with passing of the years, what is to be Christian..
>
>The fathers at Jesus time was who mostly pursued him.. HE gave them the idea of a God that can eat with anyone.. that can talk with anyone.. that can hug anyone.. That can love even the worst guy.. This is unacceptable for religion stuffs..
>
>Imagine for today a Jesus hugging a homo guy.. Well, George Bush (knowing as christian) would to declare HIM as terrorist.. And instead of cross the punishment would be to live in Cuba..