>>Himar, am I missing something here? Isn't this just a case of the Set Relation command?
>
>I assumed he wanted to define RI. SET RELATION does not define RI.

I didn't detect any hint of wanting RI

>
>>GENDBC prog, run on a databse with relationships already set up, produces a program from which you can look at the code necessary to progtrammatically set up relns. etc.
>
>Oh, right, I had forgotten about GENDBC. Actually, I thought the relation was problematic, to create programmatically.
>
>However, I still prefer the code I outlined, since it allows you to make arbitrary changes to a database structure - without changing the program every time.