I too disagree. This would only lead to the person trying to find another means of communicating (like sending a private message) with the person who used the twit filter to debate the issue, which is what was the whole point of using the twit filter in the first place.

>>Peter,
>>
>>>>>IMO the twit filters should be public. That is, it should be visible to us all which persons have been filtered out by whom.
>>>>>
>>>>>If I filter out somebody, all others are allowed to know that. If somebody appears to filter me out, I won't hesitate to make that public here, whether that serves a goal or not.
>>>>
>>>>I don't agree.
>>>
>>>What is your argument?
>>
>>See What happened to the Thread Spy? Thread #846314 for a discussion of a similar feature once implemented here, then removed. That's my argument.
>
>I have read that thread and do not think it's a similar feature. I think a member here has the right to know which other members have banned him or her. So, at least the banned person should have access to that info. What I suggest is that a member can access a page where the members are listed who have banned him or her.
>
>Moreover, I think that an accompanying, small comment would be nice. I mean, the checkbox that puts someone in the twit filter should let pop up an editbox for a small comment. In the case of Naomi, the comment would be informative to her about the reason why she was put in the twit filter.