>Peter,
>
>>>>IMO the twit filters should be public. That is, it should be visible to us all which persons have been filtered out by whom.
>>>>
>>>>If I filter out somebody, all others are allowed to know that. If somebody appears to filter me out, I won't hesitate to make that public here, whether that serves a goal or not.
>>>
>>>I don't agree.
>>
>>What is your argument?
>
>See
What happened to the Thread Spy? Thread #
846314 for a discussion of a similar feature once implemented here, then removed. That's my argument.
I have read that thread and do not think it's a similar feature. I think a member here has the right to know which other members have banned him or her. So, at least the banned person should have access to that info. What I suggest is that a member can access a page where the members are listed who have banned him or her.
Moreover, I think that an accompanying, small comment would be nice. I mean, the checkbox that puts someone in the twit filter should let pop up an editbox for a small comment. In the case of Naomi, the comment would be informative to her about the reason why she was put in the twit filter.
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
