>Tom
>
>That's a stupid idea. If I were to so nuke you I'd take out at least 18 other UT members in Sunnyvale, besides you. Then also there's the problem of how an ordinary UT member is going to get hold of an ICBM and whether or they can be trusted in charge of one. I doubt if they would be deemed so if, on the application form under "Reason for possession of fire button" they wrote "Elimination of annoying UT member". So a bit of a Catch-22 there.

LOL

But now serious again, how about MY proposal? It's modest, isn't it?! Twit-filter definitely needs improvements Thread #1175559 Message #1175559

>Worth thinking about
>
>Terry
>
>>Who needs it? Who cares? If you do not want to read messages from an individual or send messages to someone then what do you do? Twit them?
>>
>>Avoidance and abstinence can easily allow you to refrain from having contact with anyone on the UT.
>>
>>Now if people really need a Twit filter on this forum, then I suggest that we use a homing device that will launch an ICBM armed with a Nuclear Warhead to the offender’s location and eliminate the Twit once and for all! No more of these convoluted concepts and hurt feelings!
>>
>>:)