>>>And there goes the other shoe - as expected.
>>>
>>>Asked and answered:
>>>
>>>
Re: Twit Filter view in one's Account Thread #
592935 Message #
593018>>
>>Well, was that all? Was that all debate here over the years? Are you seriously refering to one reply from Michel Fournier to one person? The whole thread you're refering to is two messages! I must thank you, because it makes clear that this issue has apparantly NOT been discussed here seriously in the past.
>
>Peter,
>
>The brevity of the thread should convince you that it is NOT viewed as any kind of issue by the huge majority of UT attendees. Because you know how threads can get way way HUGE over the smallest things.
>
>It's a non-issue.
>At one time there used to be counts (and lists) of reads of messages and who did so. This was removed after some indicated privacy concerns. I consider needing to inform a twitee a privacy issue too.
Drop the word PRIVACY and all of a sudden people here (Northern Americans in the front lines) loose all appreciation for other arguments and rights.
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
