I looked at and played with strataframe. How is it "significantly better" than MM.net?



>I have helped build an enterprise class system (300+ users) using StrataFrame over the last 12 months. In my view, it is significantly better than MM.Net. However, both frameworks utilise business objects that "wrap" ADO.Net data tables or ADO.Net DataSets.
>
>Another take on this is to consider a framework that utilises a more "object" based approach to business objects. By this, I mean that a business object is a single entity e.g., an abstration of a datarow or similar, that can be contained in collection of entities (not an embedded data table) and one that supports properties that are collections of related entities. For a more domain model based approach, look at LLBL Gen Pro (not really a framework but an excellent ORM tool - there is a public domain framework that sits on top of LLBL Gen Pro called JCL http://jclframework.net/jcl/) or IdeaBlade. DevExpress also have a new framework that uses a domain based approach.
>
>>Hi .
>>I'd be interested in getting feedback from anybody who has used any of the
>>dot net frameworks. I am awate of MM and Strataframe but perhaps there are others.
>>
>>Any feedback at all in terms of ease of use, learning curve, scalability etc would be much appreciated
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Gerard