>>>>>Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> I found this today in my paper. I am sorry they say this.
>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.missoulian.com/articles/2007/01/12/bnews/br09.txt
>>>>
>>>>After all the eulogies you guys who knew him lavished on him after the event, all I can say is that, regardless of whether he was suicidal or not, he was nothing but a sh*t to take his son with him.
>>>
>>>If that's what happened. I only met him a couple of times, and those times not really in depth, but it sure never occurred to me that he had any psychological problems. Others here know him better.
>>>
>>>I've heard it said that everyone at some point thinks or talks about suicide - most of us not seriously, of course, and I don't know how serious it was in his discussions with whomever, but I'd like to think that he was the same as the majority.
>>>
>>>To the best of my knowledge, he truly loved his son. It's hard for me to believe it was a murder/suicide. It is much easier for me to accept that his son fell and he tried to grab him and went over too, but, again, I can't know.
>>
>>If they both landed feet first... I can think of another plausible interpretation: Drew punished Brent for some reason. Brent jumped or fell and Drew jumped from the guilt. If he pushed Brent from a seated position, Brent would have turned head over heels, no?
>
>You have to be a trained stunt man to control a fall. Too many factors are involved. It seems that the authorities were there and know what happened with absolute certainty. Otherwise it is only an opinion and I do not think that such an opinion should be allowed in official records.

Don't put too much credit in "authorities". They said nothing conclusive.

I've seen Drew spank Brent and I've seen how Brent reacted.