Are you advocating the equivalent of the 'FDA' exist for computer tools?



>>That is like the makers of pseudoephedrine (an excellent drug for legitimate medical purposes) responsible for the actions of consumers who use it in methlabs.
>
>Ah, but there is a lot of legislation (is that the right word here?) that prescribes who is allowed to produce and sell pseudoephedrine and who isn't. And these laws have been implemented because we don't want it to be produced or sold by people who have immoral intentions to do so.
>
>This same reasoning should be applied to tools like Refox and WE, the community, should have dealt with it a long time ago. We should have regulated its usage: when is it appropriate and when is it illegimite.