Am I? Do you read my words asif I'm proposing that? Does the FDA check ALL food? No, it doesn't. It only checks a number of specifically mentioned drugs.
I do not mind that/if governments formally forbid certain specifically types of tools and games. Tools like Refox might be allowed, but only in a controlled environment, as I proposed.
>Are you advocating the equivalent of the 'FDA' exist for computer tools?
>
>
>
>>>That is like the makers of pseudoephedrine (an excellent drug for legitimate medical purposes) responsible for the actions of consumers who use it in methlabs.
>>
>>Ah, but there is a lot of legislation (is that the right word here?) that prescribes who is allowed to produce and sell pseudoephedrine and who isn't. And these laws have been implemented because we don't want it to be produced or sold by people who have immoral intentions to do so.
>>
>>This same reasoning should be applied to tools like Refox and WE, the community, should have dealt with it a long time ago. We should have regulated its usage: when is it appropriate and when is it illegimite.
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
