>>>>>Try with SYS(1104) in between.
>>>>
>>>>So what?
>>>
>>>To make it slow again. <g>
>>
>>but users want it fast, that was my point.
>>Kidding aside, 'all words' table seems to be a good thing. Agreed?
>
>Sure. I think it was proposed in the first message (referenced thread).

I see it now, it's in the second message. Sorry, I miss it before.