>>>>>>Try with SYS(1104) in between.
>>>>>
>>>>>So what?
>>>>
>>>>To make it slow again. <g>
>>>
>>>but users want it fast, that was my point.
>>>Kidding aside, 'all words' table seems to be a good thing. Agreed?
>>
>>Sure. I think it was proposed in the first message (referenced thread).
>
>I see it now, it's in the second message. Sorry, I miss it before.

No problem <g>