If I am in denial it will take more than this load of second hand bullet points to convince me. To your specific points --

1. So what? Do you think any candidate doesn't need money?

2. Ibid.

3. Details?

4. You need a LOT more details when making such a serious accusation.

5. That might in fact be truthful. Who knows? It is smearing by innuendo, which IMO is the lowest form of political warfare.

6. Details? I doubt we are defenseless against missile attacks. More like the opposite.

If your intention was to yank my chain, you succeeded. I knew there were going to be some sour grapes after the November vote.

You're still a good guy to have a steak with. Are you buying next time?


>>Did you fully read the links?
>>
>
>Mike is in denial because he can't accept the fact that Bill and Hillary are basically communists/socialists. Here's a link and an excerpt of a Senate floor speech by Senator Inhofe (R) Oklahoma on some of the Clintonista shenanigans:
>
>http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3a7b2ae50170.htm
>
>At that time, I spoke of six proven incontrovertible facts...and let me repeat them now:
>
>1. President Clinton hosted over 100 campaign fundraisers in the White House, many with Chinese connections.
>
>2. President Clinton used John Huang, Charlie Trie, Johnny Chung, James Riady, and others with strong Chinese ties to raise campaign money.
>
>3. President Clinton signed waivers to allow his top campaign fundraiser's aerospace company to transfer U.S. missile guidance technology to China.
>
>4. President Clinton covered up the theft of our most valuable nuclear weapons technology.
>
>5. President Clinton lied to the American people over 130 times about our nation's security while he knew Chinese missiles were aimed at American children.
>
>6. President Clinton single-handedly stopped the deployment of a national missile defense system, exposing every American life to a missile attack, leaving America with no defense whatsoever against an intercontinental ballistic missile.