>If I am in denial it will take more than this load of second hand bullet points to convince me. To your specific points --
>
>1. So what? Do you think any candidate doesn't need money?
>
>2. Ibid.
>
>3. Details?
>
>4. You need a LOT more details when making such a serious accusation.
>
>5. That might in fact be truthful. Who knows? It is smearing by innuendo, which IMO is the lowest form of political warfare.
>
>6. Details? I doubt we are defenseless against missile attacks. More like the opposite.
>
>If your intention was to yank my chain, you succeeded. I knew there were going to be some sour grapes after the November vote.
>
>You're still a good guy to have a steak with. Are you buying next time?
>
>


These were comments by a respected US Senator. And yes, I'll buy next time.<g>