>>If I am in denial it will take more than this load of second hand bullet points to convince me. To your specific points --
>>
>>1. So what? Do you think any candidate doesn't need money?
>>
>>2. Ibid.
>>
>>3. Details?
>>
>>4. You need a LOT more details when making such a serious accusation.
>>
>>5. That might in fact be truthful. Who knows? It is smearing by innuendo, which IMO is the lowest form of political warfare.
>>
>>6. Details? I doubt we are defenseless against missile attacks. More like the opposite.
>>
>>If your intention was to yank my chain, you succeeded. I knew there were going to be some sour grapes after the November vote.
>>
>>You're still a good guy to have a steak with. Are you buying next time?
>>
>>
>
>
>These were comments by a respected US Senator. And yes, I'll buy next time.<g>

Which Senator? I would ask the same questions of him I put to you.

If you want to buy the steaks next time, well, OK <g>. Should we invite Patrick?