From what I've read, yes. But like I said, Microsoft has been telling us for 12 years not to do that. Its like when MS told us back in the DOS 6 and Win 3.0 days (or earlier, I didn't do Windows until then) to quit accessing hardware directly at the application level. Everybody cried "Foul!" when their apps got broken by Win 95. I'm sorry to offend, but it is just "Too Sad"! We were warned.

>So on a simple peer-to-peer 'vista' network, a SHARE'd install folder that was created under Program Files would be off limits to users who wished to store files in child folders of the Shared folder?
>
>