>Hi, Dmitry,
>
>I don't immediately see an issue - you're sure that an INSERT was done on that ocnnection, just prior to you calling scope_identity?
>
>This may not answer your specific question, but here's a thought - I noticed you posted this under SQL2005. In 2005, there's an alternative to using scope_identity that (in my opinion) is a bit more efficient. SQL2005 now includes an OUTPUT clause that allows you to get immediate feedback on what's been inserted (or updated). So you could do something like this...
>
>
>DECLARE @tTestTable TABLE ( MainPK [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL, Name Char(50))
>INSERT @tTestTable OUTPUT Inserted.MainPK VALUES ('Kevin Goff')
>
>
>That will return the value of the identity columnn that was just inserted.
>
>(Output basically provides visibility to the INSERTED and DELETED system tables, that previously were only visibile in a database trigger)
>
>
>If you have multiple inserts and want to direct them to a temporary area, you can redirect the OUTPUT...
>
>
>DECLARE @tTestTable TABLE ( MainPK [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL, Name Char(50))
>
>declare @ttemp table (mainpk int)
>INSERT @tTestTable OUTPUT Inserted.MainPK into @ttemp VALUES ('Kevin Goff')
>INSERT @tTestTable OUTPUT Inserted.MainPK into @ttemp VALUES ('Steve Goff')
>
>select * from @ttemp
>
>
>Again, that doesn't answer your specific question, but now that I have all my clients on SQL2005, I've cut down on scope_identity in favor of this approach.
>
>Kevin
Hi Kevin,
I have not really studied your code. And I don't mind changing my approach to getting the Identity value differently. But I thought that OUTPUT is used with stored procedure. And I insert using SPT method (from VFP).
And my Insert and getting Identity is done on the same connection: I only use one connection for my application.
Thank you.
"The creative process is nothing but a series of crises." Isaac Bashevis Singer
"My experience is that as soon as people are old enough to know better, they don't know anything at all." Oscar Wilde
"If a nation values anything more than freedom, it will lose its freedom; and the irony of it is that if it is comfort or money that it values more, it will lose that too." W.Somerset Maugham