You think then I'd be allowed to do something about it? I can see it now. We start with drivers. A pogrom against drivers who refuse to signal lane changes and turns, drivers who divide the speed limit by 2 and add 10% of their IQ to figure out how fast to drive, drivers who wait forever to come out of shopping mall exits while there are no cars around, until you get close, then swing out in front of you, drivers who enter an intersection when the cars on the other side are backed up so that they end up sitting in the middle of the intersection when the light changes. When that's all done, then we re-evaluate to see if there are enough people left to be concerned about. My guess is not.

>Alan Popow for U.S. President!!! (Hey, if Arnold has his way, it COULD happen :o)
>
>
>
>
>>>>>Yes, that being 2000, and the curve is in cyan, but I can't relate the industrial revolution inset to the very steep line on the graph. If we discouunt the black line exprapolation then the height isn't much more than the previous peaks.
>>>>>
>>>>>In any case, I can't refute that CO2 levels have gone up - they're bound to with so many millions of us burning, so the latest graph peak has a boost from us. Thing is, I'm not so worried about it. CO2 is plant food - positive feedback.
>>>>
>>>>And the fact that there are far fewer trees than there once were to use that CO2 doesn't bother you at all? Not to mention the fact that there will be less and less plant life as human societies expand more and more.
>>>>
>>>Farm plants consume CO2 too, and many of them are selected specifically because they do it better than wild plants.
>>
>>And the amount of farm land is also diminishing as cities expand and turn it into parking lots, malls and housing developments.
>>
>>>PS: I agree with you that there are too many people around.
>>
>>But unfortunately, they won't let me do anything about it. ;)