>Dorin,
>
>I do know of SQL Server Compact Edition {and have posted before about its (current) lack of stored procedures ;-) } and agree it is a suitable replacement for dbfs. But it still doesn't come close to VFP's persistent auto-disk-spanning resultsets. My understanding was that MS saw this as a priority for Linq. There are posts to this effect from MS many months back.


John,

I don't mean to sound antagonistic, but why do you have this need for "auto-disk-spanning resultsets". We deal with 500,000 record cursors all the time and have never had the need to span disks. I'm at a loss here to understand this. Can you shed some light?