This is an invitation to Etecnologia to define to the forum users what it wants to be.

- Do you want to create a compiler for VFP9 to .Net, and remain in that position?
- Or do you want to be the alternative VFP-manufacturer? Because by extending the VFP-languange in your compiler, you could supply and define a "VFP10".

Which position do you want to take?
And if you would like to take the 2nd position, would you like people to have additions made to the VFP10-wish list? Is it a good idea to make an Etecnologia-chapter on UT? etc. etc.
Maybe others, reading this thread, can expand or comment on the idea of ET (the whole word is too long, so I propose the shorthand ET :-) taking VFP further beyond version 9.

Maybe you (ET) don't know still, which is also a perfectly sound answer. But I (and maybe others too) am curious about your (present and future) position.

Lennert