>This is an invitation to Etecnologia to define to the forum users what it wants to be.
>
>- Do you want to create a compiler for VFP9 to .Net, and remain in that position?
>- Or do you want to be the alternative VFP-manufacturer? Because by extending the VFP-languange in your compiler, you could supply and define a "VFP10".
>
>Which position do you want to take?
>And if you would like to take the 2nd position, would you like people to have additions made to the VFP10-wish list? Is it a good idea to make an Etecnologia-chapter on UT? etc. etc.
>Maybe others, reading this thread, can expand or comment on the idea of ET (the whole word is too long, so I propose the shorthand ET :-) taking VFP further beyond version 9.
>
>Maybe you (ET) don't know still, which is also a perfectly sound answer. But I (and maybe others too) am curious about your (present and future) position.
>
>Lennert
Lennert, I have sent a copy of your post to
info@etecnologia.net, using the Email button. Hope they'll answer.
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
