Information générale
Titre:
ETecnologia could define vfp10
Versions des environnements
Network:
Windows 2003 Server
This is an invitation to Etecnologia to define to the forum users what it wants to be.
- Do you want to create a compiler for VFP9 to .Net, and remain in that position?
- Or do you want to be the alternative VFP-manufacturer? Because by extending the VFP-languange in your compiler, you could supply and define a "VFP10".
Which position do you want to take?
And if you would like to take the 2nd position, would you like people to have additions made to the VFP10-wish list? Is it a good idea to make an Etecnologia-chapter on UT? etc. etc.
Maybe others, reading this thread, can expand or comment on the idea of ET (the whole word is too long, so I propose the shorthand ET :-) taking VFP further beyond version 9.
Maybe you (ET) don't know still, which is also a perfectly sound answer. But I (and maybe others too) am curious about your (present and future) position.
Lennert
Suivant
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement