I agree with Brian on the IDE. There are little things about VFP's IDE that bug me. For example, Intellisense in VFP just seems to get in the way more then helping. There's just something about the way it's implemented that makes it less helpful to me then other IDes.


>Brian,
>
>I can't believe I'm actually saying this, but I think that's a bit strong. I absolutely agree with you that the quintessential VFP app can be written effectively in .NET.
>
>However, I actually disagree with you about the IDE. I consider the VFP IDE to be at least as good, and maybe even a little better than the IDE in VS2005. Now, MS made some big enhancements to the debugger in VS2005, but there are still a few aspects of the VFP IDE that I wish were in the VS2005 IDE.
>
>I've been a big advocate for learning .NET - but this type of post is a little more alienating than instructive. (Good god, has John Ryan invaded my body???)