>>Now back to the original point. Peter wants to know the reasoning for stopping the development, making his future decisions. I think he has the right to in asking this. Whether YAG will or can answer that is a different issue. But at least be clear about it. There is no point in beating arround the bush. If you can say, say. If not say so too.
>
>Isn't "they want the VFP development team working on .NET" an answer? Where is the beating around the bush?

That would be an acceptable answer, *IF* that is the real answer. It sure would mean some ammunition to those uninformed who think there is nothing wrong with .NETs data handling capabilities.