>>>Now back to the original point. Peter wants to know the reasoning for stopping the development, making his future decisions. I think he has the right to in asking this. Whether YAG will or can answer that is a different issue. But at least be clear about it. There is no point in beating arround the bush. If you can say, say. If not say so too.
>>
>>Isn't "they want the VFP development team working on .NET" an answer? Where is the beating around the bush?
>
>That would be an acceptable answer, *IF* that is the real answer. It sure would mean some ammunition to those uninformed who think there is nothing wrong with .NETs data handling capabilities.
Well I think that it is definitely part of the answer. The VFP guys (not sure if all or some) ARE working on data stuff in .NET. That is no secret.
Cheers,
Jamie