I guess I pulled the wrong thread then <g> I just quickly glanced that particular message. I now have to read it myself.

>Hi Hans,
>
>As far as CA are concearned I am novice just like you :)
>I hv read entire (drammatic!) thread that Naomi sent you, and almost got
>afraid to go CA way as I was planning for upcoming CS project.
>I don't know if things discussed/discovered there got fixed since 2003.
>
>Just purchased VFP9, so I was planning to explore new ways
>doing it other then 'classic' RV/ODBC scenario.
>
>But unless I hear some positive story about CA, I think I am gonna stick with RV's. <g>
>
>Good Luck
>
>
>>Don't worry; at least it was worth trying. This thread is from 2003 and - I assume - from the CA of VFP 8. Now we have VFP 9 since some time and - as naive as I am - I am assuming that someone might have done some work with SQL 2005 backend and using VFP9's CA, which by the way seems to be a powerful tool, but I am only slowly beginning to comprehend it.
>>
>>I found in my present project, that using CAs to retrieve data is done in a snap (one record, several records, with or without computed fields etc) and also using CAs to store data to an MS SQL backend in conjunction with the famous Begin Transaction - End Transaction cycle works fine. Therefore I have the hope that someone might have done some work on this topic as well in the last two years using VFP 9 and its CAs, who has the knowledge which I need.
>>
>>>Sorry for confusing you, we can find some threads here as well, say, Re: Again, troubles with CursorAdapter Thread #819734 Message #820803
>>>
>>>>Yes, I had a look at it, when I save to URL. Let's wait see what is coming up.
>>>>
>>>>>They are not an article, just ideas exchange, thus a bit hard to translate.