One comment about this John:

>How does this compare to your own assertion today that SP are used so all processing can occur on the server?

This server processing doesn't necessarily mean the *SQL Server* IMHO. It simply means "server-side" as opposed to "client-side". You *can* have biz and data access layers server-side you know. <g>

~~Bonnie






>Yes, I read the link. I didn't see anything in there that would lead me to understand what you apparently inferred from what was said. I think you should read the article again, with a different set of eyes.
>
>I think you should try to get into the spirit of the technical discussion.
>
>Does Anders refer to in-memory processing in NET?
>
>What is the current party line regarding in-memory processing in NET?
>
>What "inference" do you draw from that?
>
>How often does Anders refer to FP in the article? In what regard?
>
>How does this compare to your own assertion today that SP are used so all processing can occur on the server?