In addition to what Mike said about VB being VB.Net for purposes of this discussion, the stated purpose of the DLR is for web apps. So I wouldn't hold out any hope that this would have any effect whatsoever for VFP.

>Dynamic Languages have just been given first-class status (well, more or less) within .Net, with the announcement of the Dynamic Language Runtime: http://blogs.msdn.com/hugunin/archive/2007/04/30/a-dynamic-language-runtime-dlr.aspx.
>
>Does this change anything for VFP? Notice that Visual Basic is one of the languages being demoed. That's right: VB, not VB.Net.
>
>Hank Fay