>>>I wonder, this thread has become way too long and is currently dealing with its 20th off-topic issue. Shouldn't we start a new one about this issue?
>>
>>No. This is still not the longest thread in history of UT, and probably not the best case of thread drift. I also think that moving to a new thread works if done right away, within the first dozen messages in one direction of a drift. If done later, they both keep their separate lives, and further zigzag in unpredictable directions.
>
>Yours and John Baird's (ignominious, I had to look that one up in the dictionary) plea miss emoticons like :) and <g>. But I see the humor nevertheless.
>
>Having said that, isn't it WORTH a separate thread, a more focussed thread with serious replies? Or is it just me who's too serious here.

No. Its not. There was no humor implied in my last response. I don't care to hear anymore about Naomi's plight on other forums. I could care less if MSDN has a policy of discrimination against sites that are not non-commercial. I could care less if Foxite bans people after many warnings. Naomi was told not to post links to the UT so what did she do? She posted that it came from the UT. She couldn't differentiate between the spirit of the law and the letter of the law and suffered the consequences. She and the rest of you need to suck it up, forget about it and move on. This horse is a bloody brown spot on the carpet.