General information
Category:
VFP Compiler for .NET
Hi Markus,
>
>we can indeed use AT() instead of RAT() with "Vorname" as there's no embedded space in any "Vorname" value. Just checked it and changed the program.
>
>The difference is not measurable but in theory it should be faster. Perhaps we had to check such things on slower machines. ;-)
That would be an easy task with only a few twists - but I had a scenario once where my optimaztion speeded up things on PIII / Athlon / Athlon 64 architecture but another form of coding would translate into more speed gains in the back then prevalent netburst designs (PIV and "those" Celerons). But I never really was a fan of the netburst architecture - there is just one in my zoo sitting there mainly for testing business - so netburst got a small boost and the others a larger one...
regards
thomas
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only