>>>>>>Also, in case of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Liberty_Incident, it looks like a failed attempt to blame Egypt.
>>>>>
>>>>>That's very good example why wikipedia cannot be considered as a trusted source of information.
>>>>
>>>>OK, I won this bet.
>>>
>>>I don't know what 'bet' you mean, but I don't appreciate that you cut off my message with the explicit purpose to win something.
>>
>>I bet against myself again that you will not mention the opinion of Dean Rusk, or that of the then CIA director Richard Helms, or accounts of survivors, or the BBC documentary, but will just slam Wikipedia.
>
>I didn't mention those opinions because I have no idea about them. What I actually know is that Liberty story is purposedly propagated (with specific angle) through the web by people of particular attitude.
>I think it is time to finish this part of the thread.

C'mon guys, it's just starting to get good!