>>>I bet against myself again that you will not mention the opinion of Dean Rusk, or that of the then CIA director Richard Helms, or accounts of survivors, or the BBC documentary, but will just slam Wikipedia.
>>
>>I didn't mention those opinions because I have no idea about them. What I actually know is that Liberty story is purposedly propagated (with specific angle) through the web by people of particular attitude.
>>I think it is time to finish this part of the thread.
>
>C'mon guys, it's just starting to get good!

When a particular attitude discards accounts by people they generally (and presumably) agree with, just because the links to them go through Wikipedia, then it really is time to finish this off.