C'mon Sylvain... what if every command and function is defined/described in a table? Then you could have a million commands/functions or 10 million, all with the same code in the first place.

It is an assumption that backwards compatibility costs lots of extra code, yet was stated as a fact.


>C'mon Jim, it doesn't take a genious to figure out without looking at the actual code that the more code and fonctionality you have, the harder it is to maintain (all other things being equal).
>
>>Really?
>>You've seen the source and assessed the high cost of maintaining such compatability?
>>
>>You are a lucky (and rare) person to have done so.