And again I completely side with you.
>>After I became aware tonight of one or specific actions that took place a while ago by one or multiple individuals, this confirms that some actions have been taken. However, to protect the integrity of the personal data, this cannot be discussed furthermore.
>
>Well, your English is good, but here it leaves a little to be desired - your wording is not clear. But it seems that the end result is that you are hiding behind the "integrity of the personal data" in order to avoid direct questions you've been asked. Although you have been directly asked if UT consultants or other UT staff could view passwords, you have refused to answer. This reveals a lack of respect for your users and their rights to know that the UT is taking appropriate precautions. Answering this question does not in any way reveal anyone's personal data. Not answering reveals a lot about your attitude toward your users.
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
