>>>>>>It barks, therefore it is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Nope, you are a DIA (dyslexic insomniac agnostic ). You spend all your nights awake pondering the existence of dog.<g>
>>>>>
>>>>>Er barko, er sum, hmmmm. OK
>>>>
>>>>Arfo ergo sum?
>>>
>>>"I think, therefore I am" said {insert your favorite stupid ethnic group} and vanished.
>>
>>And as we skeptics say:
>>Sum, ergo cogito (I am, therefore I think) (with apologies to Descartes)
>
>Actually, isn't it "Cogito ergo reputo sum" (I think, therefore I think I am).

FMI is there not a word for "that" (like "quis" or summat) that would need to go in that sentence: I think, therefore I think that I am? Only in English AFAIK do we drop the conjunction