>Hi Cathy,
>
>I've added a rating and a validation. Thanks for staying on them about this one.

Cool. I already complained about a related problem with the record pointer being on the next record when the Print When logic is evaluated and MSFT has refused to fix it. I don't know how they can consider that not important .. If I'm evaluating "Print When" it's pretty reasonable to think that I want to evaluate the fields of the same record that is about to print .. not the next one! Duh!!