>>Hi Cathy,
>>
>>I've added a rating and a validation. Thanks for staying on them about this one.
>
>Cool. I already complained about a related problem with the record pointer being on the next record when the Print When logic is evaluated and MSFT has refused to fix it. I don't know how they can consider that not important .. If I'm evaluating "Print When" it's pretty reasonable to think that I want to evaluate the fields of the same record that is about to print .. not the next one! Duh!!

I added my vote also just in case. Do you have a link to the other one?