LOL Yeah, it appears that we are in the days of 'take what we are given and like it'. Oh well, we do what we can and hope that they are doing what they can given budget and the 'friendly droids upstairs'.

>>Hi Cathy,
>>
>>I've added a rating and a validation. Thanks for staying on them about this one.
>
>Cool. I already complained about a related problem with the record pointer being on the next record when the Print When logic is evaluated and MSFT has refused to fix it. I don't know how they can consider that not important .. If I'm evaluating "Print When" it's pretty reasonable to think that I want to evaluate the fields of the same record that is about to print .. not the next one! Duh!!