>>If I red this well, you won't get back the taxes from 2005, 2006 and 2007 because you 'accepted' to pay and didn't go on appeal. I got the impression that you did not accept and went to appeal.
>>
>>Anyway, I hope you'll get back much money. At least they should compensate you for the costs you made (lawyer, etc.).
>
>A collected tax is reimbursed to the CRA. This doesn't belong to the companies. So, once a collect of tax is done and reimbursed to the CRA, the CRA will not do the reverse process even if they admit that this tax shouldn't have been charged in the first place.
>
>What I accepted to pay, as far as several payments were done a few months ago, was the uncollected tax for 2004. The CRA went back at me and ask me to pay a certain amount of tax that I never collected in the first place. This is what I refused to do for a very long time but later on the advices have been to start paying that amount in case I would loose which would make the interest much lower. So, those payments will be reimbursed with interest. The tax is also removed. And, the requested balance of the uncollected tax will be cancelled.
Michel,
Thanks for the explanation. Have a nice weekend.
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
