Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
TABLEUPDATE() -- limit on records?
Message
De
13/08/1998 22:30:12
Charlie Schreiner
Myers and Stauffer Consulting
Topeka, Kansas, États-Unis
 
 
À
13/08/1998 13:09:06
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Problèmes
Divers
Thread ID:
00126606
Message ID:
00126778
Vues:
15
>We have a program which deletes 1,100 records, then we try to issue a TABLEUPDATE() on the table. It fails, giving us a "Record is in Use by Another" (109) error.
>When we delete only 400 records, it works just fine.
>The users are running on NT workstations on a Novell LAN.
>(Late possibility: Does Novell have some sort of limit on the number of record locks possible? Are we running into it?)

I haven't kept up with the defaults in 4.11, but with older versions (3), there was a default number of record locks at 500. This can be upped on the file server, but for software not running in house, you may have problems.
Charlie
Précédent
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform