>>>>Dennis Kucinich dropping presidential bid
>>>
>>>The way I understand it it is to concentrate energies/money to his re-election for Congress where he has way better chances. Makes sense to me. Then again, some of the things he said in the debates also made sense to me.
>>
>>I think he did what he possibly could, just like John Edwards. I mean, you can get only so far saying things the corporate media don't want to hear. So you get to be the third candidate who gets a honorable mention after about 90 minutes of speaking of the top two, and when their soundbites were repeated at least six times.
>>
>>Which makes Kucinich (aka Kučinić) with Edwards the couple I'd like to see in the White house. They can toss a coin as to who gets to be vice.
>
>
>I can't believe you like Edwards. He is even phonier than Romney.

After Iowa, I waited for those 90 minutes and finally got to actually hear the guy. And I remember I marked him as worth listening to back in 2004 or so. Also, during the two or three minutes he had, I haven't heard any general soundbite that would raise a red flag.

Phoney? Just because he doesn't have to go around beg for money like any honest politician should, right? You got something against the rich? :)